Sunday, April 5, 2009

SOCIAL JUSTICE SA: Are strategically kept: nuclear weapons in themselves: the international crime, listed under the UN genocide declaration: "Conspiracy to commit genocide"?

(Social Justice South Africa )

Article by Marc Aupiais

--Genocide questions: series of articles-- "Modern Western Genocides?"--

--Genocide-- Is the keeping of Nuclear weapons, either in threat of use: or intent of use-- the crime: conspiracy to commit genocide: listed under the UN definition of Genocide?--- Ultimately interested look at the idea--fault?--must conspiracy to commit genocide: be secretive: or can simple agreement to commit genocide suffice: but most, if not all legal systems do not require secrecy for "conspiracy", or the equivalent to have taken place-- meaning that the definition could well  be adequate to be the crime mentioned--

Before starting, I am about to link to my favorite UN ("United Nations") declaration of all time: the same by which this service has raised questions about current and past situations: involving certain anonymous European and a certain North American country as regards crimes under the genocide declaration: before.

--Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide-- Approved and proposed for signature and ratification or accession by General Assembly resolution 260 A (III) of 9 December 1948-- entry into force 12 January 1951, in accordance with article XIII--
As Listed on the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights' website!
http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/p_genoci.htm

herein quoted from: as "The Convention".

According to The Convention listed: "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such": (after which it lists just five actions which are genocide): are genocide.

Previously we covered Article 2 section d of "The Convention": noting that it is not that hard to claim ...based on it: that abortion laws: aimed at a national group: as laws generally are: were in fact: intrinsically aimed at reducing future population: as the Genocide declaration feared: by listing the imposing of efforts to prevent births: and that such fear could only be for future population: and that those supporting legal abortion: intrinsically desire a proportion of a national group to be prevented: whether or not for population control-- and further: that such laws are generally: if not always: imposed, or enforced on a population, or government-- No counter arguments have yet been offered by viewers of the argument therein presented.

For the present article: we will look at the Genocide declaration as relation to the proposition: that the use of nuclear weapons against another nation's cities: is genocide: and that keeping nuclear weapons: even as a threat to do this: could be the crime the genocide declaration names: "Conspiracy to commit Genocide"("The Convention").

Programs such as the American, or French nuclear programs: claim to be defensive: yet even American policies have admitted exactly how they plan to prevent harm to their on population: their nuclear program against Russia: was popularly known as MAD: "Mutually Assured Destruction": yet: the threat by which they protect themselves is one and the same: we will attack people of your national or ethnic grouping: if you do this or that. While for political reasons: is it  not in itself: the dropping of a nuclear bomb, or the launching of such: which is the seeming set plan: is this not the very crime: as it is aimed at the particular intent of destroying part of a national etc group: the intent behind the intent: surely does not matter in such?

Genocide is always aimed at a specific grouping: usually national or ethnic.

If a nuclear weapon were launched, and hit a country: lets say two Japanese cities: filled with civilians: would that be genocide: is it aimed to destroy in part or whole: a specific national group, is it aimed at those of a specific national group, is it one of the defined actions: such as killing members of a group?

Is this not the policy of many "Nuclear" states: being worked with on nuclear weapons: if they strike their own cities: they will strike those of others? Is this not the threat: the basis by which nuclear weapons are used, or stored?

Yet, surely: is it genocide if we only plan to do it if, say they do this: or they do that?

The answer, is it is highly possibly another "punishable": crime listed under the genocide declaration:

"Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:"("The Convention")
(b) "Conspiracy to commit genocide;"("The Convention")

In general conspiracy is a plot, or scheme: usually a secretive one: a scheme being:

"3: a plan or program of action ; especially : a crafty or secret one"
(Merriam Webster Dictionary: Scheme)

Now, in general: it would seem that whether or not one kept one's plan to commit genocide is secret or how secret: would not affect whether or not one had a plan to commit genocide: surely: whether secret or generally known about: contextually the word conspire: would relate to an agreement to commit genocide: whether bold or secretive.

In fact, it would seem: that in referring to conspiracy: one refers to simply the crime of agreeing to do something illegal. Such is what most legal systems would define the crime of conspiracy as.

And so: we have the threat to commit genocide: we have the seeming plan to commit genocide: and we have that the only purposeful intent of most "Nuclear Powers": is to attack an enemy's cities?

Is "Nuclear Power" over another nations: nothing but "Genocide Threat Power": we welcome suggestions on either side of this issue.




















Have comments on our articles, join our online social networks:

at Catholic Answer Forums' : Catholic Social networking

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, and feel free to leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and appropriate, legally compliant, and cordial emails (marcaup@gmail.com (Not necessarily the Author of this article) ; email our editorial staff)!

Or become a fan, or follower of our pages on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

Or Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

And one on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/user/SACATHOLICNEWSSERVIC

This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine



Check our contents via the search engine: against other Catholic services

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email



Email:


View Archives

No comments:

Post a Comment

No spam, junk, hate-speech, or anti-religion stuff, thank you. Also no libel, or defamation of character. Keep it clean, keep it honest. No trolling. Keep to the point. We look forward to your comments!

Popular Posts - This Week

Popular Posts This Month

Popular Posts | All TIme